Next-Generation Rocket Propulsion : A Comparative Evaluation Of Systems for Advancing Human Spaceflight
Abstract
Abstract - While traditional chemical propulsion systems have enabled humanity to enter space and explore nearby celestial bodies, their inherent limitations — such as low fuel efficiency, high mass ratios, and inability to support long duration missions — pose significant challenges for future interplanetary travel. In contrast, advanced propulsion technologies like ion propulsion, nuclear thermal propulsion, and plasma-based engines offer promising solutions by delivering greater efficiency, longer operational lifespans, and higher specific impulse. This study adopts a comparative evaluation methodology, analyzing multiple propulsion systems using key performance metrics such as specific impulse, thrust, efficiency, feasibility, and mission suitability. The systems are compared to assess their practicality for near-term and long-term human space exploration. Moreover, this paper investigates the potential of these next-generation propulsion stems to transform the scope, safety, and feasibility of deep space missions, particularly in the context of human exploration of Mars and beyond, highlighting the engineering advancements, physical principles, and practical challenges that must be addressed to bring these technologies from concept to mission-ready reality.
Keywords
Citation
Gujarathi, Aryan (2026). Next-Generation Rocket Propulsion : A Comparative Evaluation Of Systems for Advancing Human Spaceflight. NSRI Research Archive. Article 0009. NSRI-RA-2026-0009.
Cite this publication record.
Publication details
- Open PDF
- License
- Author-retained; open access display by NSRI unless a separate article license states otherwise.
- Peer review status
- Editorial and integrity screening for archive display; archive placement does not imply formal journal publication by NSRI.
- AI disclosure
- No AI disclosure is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
- Conflict of interest statement
- No conflict of interest statement is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
References
References are available in the manuscript PDF when provided.
Ethics and editorial note
This is an NSRI Archived Submission hosted in the NSRI Research Archive. It met baseline quality and integrity standards but was not selected for formal journal publication.
Authors are responsible for originality, authorship, ethics approvals or exemptions, safety, citations, data representations, and disclosure of conflicts or AI assistance where applicable.
For editorial questions, corrections, or integrity concerns, contact contact@nsri.world.