ScamShield: Interpretable Multi-Signal Scam Detection
Abstract
Scam and phishing detection systems typically rely on rigid heuristic rules or opaque large language models. This paper presents ScamShield: a hybrid, interpretable pipeline combining a 24-feature supervised machine learning model, an LLM semantic safety layer, and rule-based heuristics in a unified ensemble. Evaluated on a synthetic benchmark of 19,992 messages spanning 17 scam categories and validated on the UCI SMS Spam Collection (5,574 real-world messages), ScamShield achieves cross-validated F1 = 0.9969 ± 0.0004 on the synthetic benchmark and F1 = 0.9303 ± 0.0098 on real-world data — competitive with fine-tuned DistilBERT (estimated F1 ≈ 0.97–0.99) while requiring 125× less storage, operating at sub-5 ms inference latency, and providing full per-prediction interpretability via coefficient attribution. Statistical significance is confirmed by McNemar's test against all four baselines (p < 0.001). Adversarial evaluation reveals recall drops of 71–82% under obfuscation attacks, identifying semantic embeddings and character-level robustness as the primary improvement directions.
Keywords
Citation
Vishwajeet Adkine (2026). ScamShield: Interpretable Multi-Signal Scam Detection. NSRI Student Research Journal. 1(1). Article 0041. 10.67677/4bcdmk3c.
Cite this publication record.
Publication details
- Open PDF
- ISSN
- NSRI Student Research Journal
Online ISSN: 3143-5653 - License
- Author-retained; open access display by NSRI unless a separate article license states otherwise.
- Peer review status
- NSRI uses editorial and scholarly review. When appropriate, manuscripts may undergo blinded review by reviewers with relevant subject knowledge.
- AI disclosure
- No AI disclosure is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
- Conflict of interest statement
- No conflict of interest statement is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
References
References are available in the manuscript PDF when provided.
Ethics and editorial note
This manuscript was selected for formal publication in the NSRI Student Research Journal after editorial review.
Authors are responsible for originality, authorship, ethics approvals or exemptions, safety, citations, data representations, and disclosure of conflicts or AI assistance where applicable.
For editorial questions, corrections, or integrity concerns, contact contact@nsri.world.