Exact Cascade Uncertainty Under Pairwise Compression
Abstract
Higher-order data are often compressed into pairwise co-occurrence counts, but this can hide how pairs are assembled into triples. We ask for the largest possible difference in deterministic cascade size between simple 3-uniform hypergraphs with the same labeled exact pair-codegree matrix. Starting from two active vertices, a triple activates its third vertex when its other two are active. We define M₂(n) as the maximum closure-size gap inside any projection fiber on n vertices. A direct proof gives M₂(n)=0 for 2≤n≤5 and M₂(n)=n−3 for n≥6. The upper bound follows because equal codegrees force both cascades either to stop at two or reach at least three vertices. A five-edge Pasch-trade-plus-context construction attains the bound and extends to every larger n. Fresh exhaustive enumeration of all 2²⁰ simple 3-uniform hypergraphs on six labeled vertices independently checks the first ambiguous order, a maximum gap of three, and edge thresholds: four edges for different final sets, five for different sizes, and seven when non-isomorphism is additionally required on six vertices. Two separately implemented censuses agree on 69 shared summary fields. The result is a precise warning about information lost under pairwise compression for one abstract deterministic closure rule; it is not an empirical claim about real epidemics or social networks.
Keywords
Citation
Aditya Chandran Arvind (2026). Exact Cascade Uncertainty Under Pairwise Compression. NSRI Student Research Journal. 1(1). Article 0093. NSRI-J-2026-0093.
Cite this publication record.
Publication details
- Open PDF
- ISSN
- NSRI Student Research Journal
Online ISSN: 3143-5653 - License
- Author-retained; open access display by NSRI unless a separate article license states otherwise.
- Peer review status
- NSRI uses editorial and scholarly review. When appropriate, manuscripts may undergo blinded review by reviewers with relevant subject knowledge.
- AI disclosure
- No AI disclosure is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
- Conflict of interest statement
- No conflict of interest statement is attached to this public record unless stated in the manuscript.
References
References are available in the manuscript PDF when provided.
Ethics and editorial note
This manuscript was selected for formal publication in the NSRI Student Research Journal after editorial review.
Authors are responsible for originality, authorship, ethics approvals or exemptions, safety, citations, data representations, and disclosure of conflicts or AI assistance where applicable.
For editorial questions, corrections, or integrity concerns, contact contact@nsri.world.